I was made aware of a comment on Holly Briley’s blog where someone who claimed to be a member of an anti-bully blog has threatened to do what it takes to shut down another blog that has been created for the express purpose of combating bullying.

SO THE BEST WAY TO FIGHT BULLYING IS TO DENY THE FREE SPEECH OF A BLOG OFFERING ANTI BULLYING RESOURCES? THAT HARDLY MAKES SENSE TO ME

This threat is widely recognized as bullying. IF this group considers the blog in question an example of bullying, why not let it remain in existence to show others what exactly the bullying is? Why destroy the evidence?

Another question has to be is why would Holly Briley condone the denial of the first amendment rights of the blogger? Holly currently supports Sandra Goddard in the lawsuit against her by the minor plaintiff having to do with comments made on her blog Prinniefied.com. The position by most who support Ms Goddard claim the suit is an effort to end the comments about the gang rape rather than the specific charge of defamation as stated in the lawsuit.

It seems to be to be hypocritical for Holly Briley on one side to be for free speech and on the other side to be AGAINST free speech.

It seems to be that the only free speech Holly Briley wants to see is that speech that she agrees with.

Stay Tuned

MURT

 

Advertisements